Implementation, critical reflection and evaluation of an educational

School of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
1

NSN720

ASSESSMENT TASK 2

Assessment name: Implementation, critical reflection and evaluation of an educational
event

Task description:
Your assessment requires you to complete three aspects of curricula
development. You will:

1. Describe the changes that you made to your educational
event (developed in Assessment 1). based on academic
feedback provided in Assessment 1. Implement your
educational event (250 words).

2. Critically reflect on implementation of your educational event
and use educational evidence to support your points (1000
words).

3. Drawing on your analysis of implementation of educational
event, your reflections and evaluations (from peer/participant
feedback); discuss recommendations for improvement of
your educational event, draw on evidence (1500 words).

School of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
2

What you need to do:
Refer and familiarise yourself with the NSN720 unit framework – the
ADDIE MODEL (a five-phase approach to building effective learning
solutions). You will need to draw on the last two phases (implement and
evaluate) of the ADDIE model to complete this assessment task.

PART 1:

Incorporate feedback from assessment 1 to improve analysis, design
and developments phases (ADDIE model). Briefly describe how you did
this in 250 words. Implement your education event – ensure you
provide evidence of event implementation.

PART 2:

Critically reflect on implementation of the event referring to your
education event plan and use educational evidence to support your
points. This may be written in first person. 1000 words.

PART 3:

Draw on your experience of the implementation and evaluation of
event feedback to generate recommendations for improvement of the
educational event. Incorporate evidence to support your points. 1500
words.

APPENDIX (no limit, no specific mark allocated): Evidence of
implementation of educational event. You will need to provide
evidence to demonstrate that you have completed the implementation
of this event. This might be a copy of education resources used or an
email from appropriate staff or line manager stating you have
completed the event.

You will have the opportunity if required, to present at the Week 11
final workshop presentations (on campus), feedback will be provided by
academic staff and other students who are present. Include this
evidence as an Appendix.

Length: Academic essay 2750 words +/-10% (word length includes in-text
referencing and excludes your reference list and appendices)

Estimated time to
complete task:

30 hours

Weighting: 60%

How will I be assessed: +/- 7 point grading scale using a rubric>

Due date: 27th October, 2023 23:59hrs

School of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
3

Presentation
requirements:

This assessment task requires you to develop an academic essay addressing
the task. Use formal essay style of introduction, body and conclusion.

Your assignment should be written in CiteWrite APA style and prepared as
follows:

• It is a requirement that page numbers for all in-text references are
provided

• Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number, unit
code and page number

• 2cm margins on all sides, 1.5 spaced text

• Use font, such as Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman; font size 12

• CiteWrite APA style referencing

• Headings can be used to structure your assignment logically (if
applicable).

Be submitted in electronic format through your Canvas site.

What you need to
submit:

PART 1, PART 2, PART 3 and the APPENDIX are to be collated as one

document and submitted together.

Tip – CRITICAL REFLECTION

You may like to use a reflective framework to structure Part 2. The Gibbs

Reflective Cycle is a simple and adaptable option.

School of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
4

NSN720 ASSESSMENT TASK Assessment 2 RUBRIC

Learning Outcomes Assessed: 1, 3, & 4 Weighting: 60%

Criteria +/- 7 +/- 6 +/- 5 +/- 4 +/- 3 +/- 2 – 1

Advanced
Knowledge

Demonstrates
theoretical
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate
evaluation
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
plan +

Discusses
evaluation
feedback and
provides
recommendations
for improvement
of event,
supported by
relevant
educational
literature

Weighting 25%

Demonstrates
advanced
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
event

Discusses
evaluation
feedback
comprehensively
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event delivery

Points supported
by an extensive
range of credible
educational
literature

Demonstrates well
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
event

Discusses
evaluation
feedback strongly
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event delivery

Points supported
by a wide range of
credible
educational
literature

Demonstrates
focused
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate many
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
event

Discusses
evaluation
feedback well to
develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event delivery

Points supported
by credible
educational
literature

Demonstrates
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate most
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
event

Some areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
to improve future
event delivery

Majority of points
supported by
credible
educational
literature

Demonstrates
some educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate some
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
event

Many areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event delivery

Majority of points
not supported by
credible
educational
literature

Minimal
demonstration of
educational
knowledge and
skills, limited
incorporation of
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
event

Many areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event delivery

Large amounts of
writing not
supported by
credible
educational
literature

School of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
5

Critical
Reflection and
Analysis

Critically reflects
on implementation
of educational
event, supports
outcomes with an
extensive range of
literature

Weighting 25%

Persuasive critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by an
extensive range of
credible literature

Strong critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by a
wide range of
credible literature

Focused critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by
credible literature

Critical reflection
is evident in the
majority of
assessment, the
majority of points
supported by
credible literature.
Several points
would benefit from
use of further
credible literature

Limited valid
critical reflection
evident. Limited
use of relevant
literature

Limited/Lack of
critical reflection.
Large amounts
not supported by
relevant literature

Professional
writing /
communication

Demonstrates ability
to use high level
professional writing
skills to articulate
information

Weighting 10%

Writing met all 5
criteria listed below.

Well structured,
concise, analytical,
and logical flow of
concepts

Consistent application
of English conventions
throughout –
grammar/ spelling